How Much Does An Indian Mandap Cost

IRAN: NUCLEAR DE HOOP SCHEFFER

SECRETARY-GENERAL IN BERLIN, STRUCK AND MEETINGS WITH FISCHER

BERLIN, 7 October -
The NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, visiting Berlin, and 'said
concerned about the nuclear program Iran. De Hoop Scheffer announced that the Alliance level
Parliamentary Assembly, will address' the problem but
that NATO has no plans, however, to act upon it.
During his visit to Berlin, the Secretary-General 's
Alliance has had meetings with Defence Minister Peter Struck
and Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer. Also
de Hoop Scheffer and 'also met with the leader of the SPD
Franz Muentefering and leader of the opposition CDU Angela Merkel
.
In statements to reporters, said that the problem of Iran's nuclear program and
'attention
International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA. This, in a resolution,
has called on Iran to cease all efforts to produce enriched uranium
,
premise for the construction of the atomic bomb.
The Minister Fischer and 'say more' worried
times of nuclear policy in Tehran.
De Hoop Scheffer also praised the commitment of
German Bundeswehr in Afghanistan and Kosovo. About
both missions, the general secretary of the
urged a more 'close cooperation between NATO and the UN.

Jc Outlet Ontarion Mill

WORRIED ABOUT IRAN NUCLEAR PROGRAM: Khatami, IAEA grants rights

BETWEEN TWO WEEKS IS THE FILE OPENS IN VIENNA
(ANSA-AFP) - TEHRAN, 28 August - The presidnete Iran's Mohammed Khatami
ask today that the UN agency for nuclear safety
recognizes the right of the Islamic Republic
enrichment of uranium for civilian uses. ''We hope that the negotiations which have led to the logical solution
lead us to recognize our right to enrich
peaceful (uranium) and to be accepted into the club
''of countries that carry on this road,
Khatami said during a news conference.''
''Then, there will be problems,''between Iran and IAEA
assured the Iranian leader.
In two weeks, the UN agency should reopen the
Iranian dossier in Vienna.


(ANSA-AFP) - TEHRAN, Aug 28 -''The Iranian issue will not
'closed in September,''Khatami admitted,''but their attitude will determine
' in our future.'' However, he added
the Iranian president,''many problems were solved
, the Iranian dossier can 'be closed.'' It seems, still has
said that''the next report (IAEA)
could be positive.''
''We want to bring nuclear technology to produce enriched uranium
3.5%'', far from
needs' military, said Khatami, adding
that Iran wants nothing more''and 'our right and nobody can'
deprived of this technology.''
Khatami has therefore stressed the will 'of his country to cooperate
''than with the IAEA, the Europeans and others.''
''We are against, has made it clear, in any
tensions and the fact that our dossier is sent to the Security Council''
UN, as they would like the Americans.
We will do everything possible''to reach an agreement acceptable to us and other
.''

Ejaculation During Wax

ENRICHED URANIUM NUCLEAR GB, FOREIGN WASTE STORED IN ENGLAND NUCLEAR

(AP) - LONDON, Aug 31 - Thousands of cubic meters of nuclear waste from nine

foreign countries are buried in concrete tanks in two towns in Cumbria, northern England
. The Guardian reveals today
denouncing the false promises that the government had instead agreed not to store such waste from a foreign
.
contracts between British Nuclear Fuels Ltd (BNFL), the
companies' state-controlled
that handles the processing of radioactive materials, and foreign governments (including the Italian
) provide that the waste will return to their senders
after being processed in some central
UK to allow storage. According to inside sources
the Ministry of Trade and Industry which
and 'responsible for BNFL, the government would
London recently changed course on the issue
allowing the retention of foreign waste stored at Sellafield and Drigg
. In total there are 20 in Britain
nuclear sites.

Free Blue Prints Corner Desks

: Saluda, ONE YEAR OLD CONTROVERSY

RUBBIA, a possible world catastrophe
Rome, August 29 - (Adnkronos) - Tanks 'expired', geographical location
at risk, slow start-up time and waste
Security experts split on the technology. The controversy over the Saluda waste
of the roots of time. Cosi 'in 2001
a committee report 'rap' Enea, Ente
for New Technologies, Energy and Environment led by Carlo Rubbia
for the management of nuclear sites Vercelli,''one of the most '
dangerous of Italy'''. More than 1500 m / c
irradiated fuel in the system of Eurex, aged 35 years, and 1250 m / c deposit for
Avogadro still waiting
sending abroad of radioactive material for reprocessing. And in the middle of the Dora Baltea
and an aqueduct that supplies much of the Piedmont.
Just the flooding of Dora in 2000 had highlighted the
''inaffidabilita 'structural'' Eurex plants and Avogadro,
used for reprocessing and storage of radioactive material
, and now inactive, pending final action for
made safe. ''A possible global catastrophe
''he warned, then the Nobel Prize Rubbia
Commissioner Enea. Above all, the real problem was the Eurex
because of the presence of liquid in her womb
highly radioactive and in close contact with the ground water. A delicate situation seen
the old system, due
technique in 2005.



Since '97 Enea had tried to remedy with
the initiation of a process of experimentation for the construction of a new plant
solidification of the irradiated fuel,
through vitrification. The constant references to procedures
implementation forced the Commission to express''strong disagreement with the policy
Enea to offer solutions
not yet experienced ', and to require the company to solidify liquid waste
high activity' within 2005. Meanwhile
the plant was taken over by Sogin of General Carlo Jean
.
But the controversy had begun earlier. From 87, to coincide with the referendum on nuclear power, associations and trade unions organized
protest actions and awareness,
also worried by the national authorizing the discharge of radioactive substances in the Dora
from normal activities
'facilities. In 88 an agreement was signed with the British BNFL
to transfer solid waste to the Avogadro
Sellafield for treatment. The 13 monthly trips convoys
'Blind' and escorted, but 'can not start before 2002 to
security problems. Ready protests from environmentalists,
concerned about the danger of transportation and
a procedure that is called''politics''of the facade, since the return of materials in Italy
and the fact that 50% of the fuel will remain radioactive
'still in the tanks of Avogadro.

Cute Inexpensive Rustic Wedding

NUCLEAR Saluggia SCANZANO HOW? E 'CONTROVERSY ON NUCLEAR WASTE

UNIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS WITH TOO MANY temporary storage
(Luke Zanfei)
Rome, August 29 - (Adnkronos) - A 'Scanzano North' to
Saluda, in Piedmont? In the small town of Vercelli
unions and environmentalists are sharpening their weapons against the decision of the Extraordinary Commissioner
for nuclear emergencies and Sogin,
General Carlo Jean, to 'fix' 250 cubic meters of fuel
highly radioactive, one of the sites more 'dangerous for Italy, according to a survey
Parliament, in''provisional''tanks. Just in these days
Sogin, national nuclear safety authority, issued an order
from 'off the field. ''Both the Ministry of
Activities' Productive that the Environment Agency have requested
the safety of a structure bunkerizzata
these materials, stored in deposits older than 40 years,''said Sogin
justifying what by some is called a real
their 'blitz'. arguments, Sogin those that do not convince
unions and environmentalists. The risk of terrorist attacks''and 'motivation
a ridiculous and' frivolous 'and' the solution of urgency''Comella said Giorgio
responsible for energy-CGIL Piemonte. Along the same lines
the regional manager for the energy of
Legambiente, Giampiero Godio who speaks of''façade solution,
to show that you're doing something.''


The Sogin, moreover, 'accused of''failing
keeping my word.'' ''We were told in a very short time
would build a plant to secure this material
forever through
solidification of liquid fuel. Instead Comella-look-
have decided to create only temporary tanks, and only later,
to solidify the waste.'' An expenditure ''useless''even according Godio, 'cause we create structures
''destined to become relics
highly dangerous and difficult to rehabilitate.'' ''I do not understand 'cause you can not start before
a solidification process, perhaps more' complex, but certainly more 'decisive and sure''he adds.
According to the indictment, in addition, the site will rise again '
in an area with high landslide risk for the possible flooding of
Dora. But above all it is feared the vulnerability 'of the aquifers.
''Just a loss, a drop on the ground to trigger a catastrophe''warns
Comella. ''It's not 'underestimate the presence
a few miles of the aqueduct that supplies much of the Piedmont
Godio''adds. Instant replication of which is Sogin
know how''in those areas where there is no constraint. Even
the Authority 'of the pelvis and' favor.''


the same town of Saluda
expresses some discomfort for an order imposed from above''that''in fact destroys the
no administration in the construction of reservoirs in an area off limits in
plan. ''Do we have to follow the guidelines of
- Franco Barbero says the mayor - even if
that was not the right place. However I have asked guarantees
Sogin and realize they have positive responses.''
The basis of the protest there are also fears that the troubled
process to identify a single national repository for nuclear waste
, can offer the 'excuse' to only develop the
old sites. The case Scanzano ''- explains Godio -
shows how it is difficult to convince people to accept a site that is
collect nuclear waste coming from outside. Here at Saluggia
we lived together for twenty years, now we need to solve the most 'early
the problem. If this ordinance is not amended, it will be 'confirms that the
Sogin wants to postpone the solution.'' Even more 'direct
Comella: as the exponent of the path identified by the CGIL
Sogin likely to postpone indefinitely''an absolutely urgent
'':''There is not' the real intention 'to give final solution
the problem. They want to leave everything as it is'. We demand clarity.''


A worry is also the time of the transaction:''
General Jean has informed us that the construction of new storage
can not 'be at least a year. We - even remarked
Comella - we would welcome a dialogue beyond the 'order
militaristic style, to create record time of implantation
solidification''. The nodes will come to roost in the coming days.
There are already 'been demonstrations in Trino, Saluda, Vercelli.
Assemblies, sit in, meetings of awareness. Since 87
associations and trade unions have sought to involve the population
on the nuclear issue. For now I
mass mobilizations:''I think in August
excessive and we must first assess the reasons for Sogin.
without adjustments, are ready to summon the people''stresses
Godio. Along the same lines as for the CGIL Piemonte
now prefers the strategy of dialogue''to clarify'', but not exclude other initiatives
more 'sensational. And the City 'want satisfaction':''We host
nuclear power for 20 years without there ever complained.
now - says the mayor Barbero - asking for compensation from
use preventive health care, the upgrading of the environmental heritage
and initiatives to impact business partner.
also will try to work on technological innovation with the creation of
sites sites, in collaboration with Sogin.''


For now, however, 'information
intervention seems more' urgent''to avoid unnecessary alarm
''said the mayor of Saluda. We'' Sogin, asked the states to place the order
-Barbero also the commitment to action
widespread public information, which will involve print,
associations, institutions and the same''Sogin. The purpose and 'what
to involve the population in the analysis of the problem,
' empowering the company 'General Jean'. Cosi 'on 8 September are ready
technical meetings with the Environment Committee
associations and unions, and the end of October, will be summoned
public and press''for accurate information on initiatives
intraprese''spiega the mayor. Absolutely agree
environmental organizations
and unions that will move with their characteristics common strategy:''The first of September we will explain the ideas in
Commission announced almost-chorus-Comella and Godio
in the meantime we will continue to communicate and raise awareness with public meetings and
debates.''

Jc Pennyoutlet Ontarion Mill

: RANCH, Enel undertakes FOR SAFETY NUCLEAR ENERGY IN EAST EUROPE

Rome, August 28 - (Adnkronos) - Nuclear power can '
be an antidote to the high cost of bills of Italians''only in the very long period
''but right now companies like Enel degrees can work in this area in Europe, to make more 'safe plants.
Pippo Ranci, already 'president of' Energy electricity and gas
and professor of economics, spoke well 'in the controversy over
return to nuclear power as a possible antidote to the high cost of energy.
''For Italy it is not to say yes or no atom.
The question should be viewed in a new way: if our country wants to be
consistent with the choices made, should do more 'in
conversion of obsolete plants in Eastern Europe.
argued, would be heard-Ranch-kick home from the atom
our judging a risk and then left undisturbed to
our borders.'' For Ranci should also strengthen research on nuclear
secure.



(Adnkronos) - The former president Authority is said therefore support the efforts on programs of study and also a commitment on nuclear Enel abroad to make more 'secure central Europe''today that create a risk for us.''
How to clean energy, wind power through the exploitation of solar energy photovoltaic
,
great challenge for our future,''Ranci need work better and more ', making some better point
mechanisms such as green certificates that are
still very lame.''
In the opinion of Ranchi, in fact,''as
renewables are the energy saving: do not make miracles in the short term but
-underscores - with strength to carry on with tenacity,
some good results coming.''

What Do You Wear For Spray Tan, Urbandale, Waukee

, SOUTH KOREA, we have no plans ATOMIC WEAPONS

ENRICHED URANIUM TEST EXPERIMENT Extemporaneous
(AP) - SEOUL, 3 September - The day of admission to
surprise test taken in the past to enrich uranium, the
South Korea has not officially declared today
have any nuclear weapons program and that uranium from some
its scientists in 2000 was a byproduct of tests conducted
to separate materials using a laser.

NUCLEAR SOUTH KOREA, we have no plans ATOMIC WEAPONS
(ANSA) - SEOUL, 3 SET -''It 'was a test - said to journalists
Oh Joon, director general of the Ministry of Foreign
for relations with international organizations -
fundamentally different from those conducted by Iran and Korea
North and no breach of the Non-Proliferation
.
The experiment was not intended to obtain enriched uranium and e '
was an isolated case and impromptu. The equipment was dismantled
few months later and the government and '
only recently been informed by the scientists involved. For our part we
immediately informed the International Atomic Energy Agency
(IAEA).''
's statements came Oh
while a group of IAEA inspectors began testing in South Korea to determine what happened and whether
violanzione
clauses of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation nucelare.
''calm''We are absolutely confirmed
other unofficial sources deny that the revelations could affect adversely the
six-party talks to resolve the crisis triggered by
nuclear ambitions of North Korea and
his secret plan for enrichment uranium.
Admissions in Seoul were still created
embarrassment among the allies, principally the United States and Japan. If the admissions are
'' confermate, si tratta di un fatto

deplorevole'', aveva detto stamani il portavoce ufficiale del

governo giapponese Hiroyuki Sonoda.

Where Can I Buy Old Versions Of Dreamweaver

04/09/2004 USA - Court of Appeal refused the request on Yucca Mountain

IN ENGLISH

---------------



Court Ruling Adds To Setbacks For Yucca Mountain Application

A US court has turned down a request to reconsider its recent decision on the

compliance standard for the planned used fuel repository at Yucca Mountain in the state

of Nevada.

The US Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia refused without comment a request

by the US Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) to reconsider a decision made in July on the

Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) compliance standard for Yucca Mountain [see News

in Brief No. 24, 24th August 2004 and Feature No. 5, 4th August 2004].

In its 9th July ruling, the court said that EPA’s standard improperly deviated from a

recommendation by the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) that the compliance period

during which the repository design must be able to limit the release of radionuclides within

several kilometres of the site should encompass a period beyond 10,000 years.

In a separate decision announced on 31st August, a pre-licensing hearing board of the Atomic

Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) of the country’s Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

unanimously ruled that the electronic database required for the Department of Energy’s (DOE)

licence application was seriously flawed. The decision effectively “stopped the clock” on the

licence application process.

By law, the DOE must post the database on NRC’s web-based Licensing Support Network

(LSN) six months before the NRC can docket (formally register) the licence application.

Docketing officially starts the licensing process and the LSN submission must contain virtually

all submissions on which the DOE intends to base its application. The three-member ASLB

panel ruled that the submission to the LSN was not complete. The NRC said it plans to make

the entire decision available on its website (http://hlwehd.nrc.gov/Public_HLW_EHD/home.asp).

A link to the decision has already been posted on the website of a US environmental group,

Public Citizen (www.citizen.org/pressroom). Click on the Yucca Mountain press release and the

link is currently available at the end of that document.

The ASLB’s decision was based on a 12th July motion filed by the state of Nevada, which made

a number of accusations against the DOE including that it failed to make all of its documentary

material available.

The DOE responded to the charges on 22nd July, “asserting that its certification and

documentary production fully complied with the regulations”, but the ASLB said DOE’s

arguments were “without merit”. The ASLB concluded: “That because of the incompleteness of

its (DOE’s) document review and production, the many years in which DOE has had to gather

and produce its documents, and the fact that the date of production was effectively within DOE’s

control, DOE’s document production on 30th June 2004 did not satisfy its obligation to make, in

good faith, all of its documentary material available (in line with federal regulations).”

The board pointed out that in its certification, DOE stated it had made available 2,090,474

documents. Of these, approximately half were available with full text and headlines, and the

other half were only headlines, with no text. Only about 500,000 documents had actually been

placed on the official LSN server; the rest were available only on DOE’s own web site. The

board also found that a large number of documents were missing from both web sites.





Court Ruling Adds To Setbacks For Yucca Mountain Application

The DOE has not yet publicly responded to the ASLB ruling.

NRC spokeswoman Sue Gagner told NucNet that the DOE has 10 days to appeal the ASLB

ruling to the NRC, or the NRC commissioners could decide to review the decision independently

of an appeal. (Only three members currently are sitting on the five-member Commission that

heads the NRC. These three commissioners will be the ones to consider any appeal.

The commissioners will decide whether they want to review the decision and how they want to

do it, said Ms Gagner. They could refuse to consider an appeal (leaving the ASLB decision in

place); they could review the decision based on the material presented to the ASLB, or they

could call for additional information from the DOE, the state of Nevada, or others. If they review

the ASLB decision, the commissioners are not required to decide by a specific time.

The NEI’s director of media relations, Steve Kerekes, told NucNet that the ASLB decision

“should have no adverse effect on the current schedule for submitting a licence application by

the end of the year”. He said the public will still “have at least six months to review all

documents, since the licence application wouldn’t be docketed for at least six months” after

DOE’s LSN submission is certified.

However, Steve Frishman of the Nevada Agency for Nuclear Projects disagreed, saying that the

regulations are clear in stipulating that DOE is required to make its LSN database available “no

later than six months in advance of submitting its licence application”.

The NRC is headed by five commissioners appointed by the US president and confirmed by the

Senate for five-year terms. One of them is designated by the president to be the chairman and

official spokesman of the Commission. Only three commissioners, including the chairman, are

sitting at present.

The ASLB conducts hearings for the Commission and performs other regulatory functions as

authorised by the Commission. ASLB comprises a chief administrative judge (chairman), three

associate chief administrative judges, and a varying number of other administrative law judges

(15 at present) who serve on the three-member ASLB panels to decide licensing and other

issues. The ASLB panel on LSN certification was chaired by associate chief judge Thomas

Moore, and included judges Alex Karlin and Alan Rosenthal.



Sources: U.S. correspondent NucNet Thecla Fabian / ASLB / NRC / AS /
Various Editor: John Shepherd

What Is The Name Of Patricia Bath's Husband

IN EU: NUCLEAR; PROPOSALS READY BRUSSELS, GREEN

TOMORROW European Commissioner De Palacio
this package (ANSA) - Brussels, 7 September - The Commission European
will present 'tomorrow two directives on the security of nuclear material in
and treatment of waste. initiative strongly criticized by the Green Group in the European Parliament.
''This is a new package that takes into account both
the positions of the European Parliament that those countries
States,''he explained today spokesman
EU Commissioner for Transport and Energy, Loyola de Palacio, who drew up the package that will
'announced tomorrow. The spokesman
and 'refused to go into further details
explaining that the contents of the proposal will'
revealed only tomorrow.
Nevertheless ', the initiative of Commissioner and English'
been harshly criticized by the European Greens have called
a''caricature''of European legislation and called on other members of the College
EU not to become''
ridiculous''and not to support the initiative to de Palacio.
The package will deal with 'issues rather delicate. First
one place on the financing of decommissioning of nuclear
into disuse.
The Commission will propose 'a
''calendar''within which member countries must
find sites for the disposal of nuclear waste.
a very sensitive issue that threatens to create tensions between governments
Europe and the European parliament.
Finally, the two directives deal with the updating of the current node

European system for assessing the safety of nuclear installations.
Recalling that''just two months ago''
governments have rejected a similar proposal for reform of European legislation on the nuclear
, Greens argue that the new attempt
de Palacio will put 'in serious trouble' again next
European Commission to be in place 'in November.
''De Palacio - stuck in a statement
Green MEP Claude Turmes - has no qualms about poisoning the life of the future Commission
leaving behind a legislative proposal
that, at present, has no hope of going
forward''. Greens criticized in particular the proposals
on nuclear waste, according to the European group,''
you can earn in the real atomic dustbins
''not only in third countries such as Russia, but also
within the European Union.

Brazilian Waxing Images Man

NUCLEAR ATTACK: A TORTOLI LEGAMBIENTE ONLY CONFUSION AND ALARMS

ROME, 7 September - ''Legambiente
seems to have a single strategy: to create confusion and alarm. If it is not 'so',
then try to be constructive and tell us all where we
dispose of nuclear waste and normal ones.''
Cosi 'Undersecretary for Environment, Roberto Tortoli (Florence), back on the comparison distance between the government and environmentalists
on energy issues and the nuclear issue in particular that
and' opened at the International Workshop on
decommissioning nuclear
agencies organized by the EU and UN in Rome until 10 September.
''environmentalists against nuclear thunder -
Tortoli said in a statement - but say nothing of the approaches to
our doorstep and the fact that we are forced to buy from other countries
high-cost nuclear power. Even
Legambiente - Tortoli states - and 'aware that it is' urgent
the creation of a repository for nuclear waste
second category. On this there must be no doubts. For the rest
, my proposal of the bicameral - highlights
Secretary - was aimed at creating a spirit of cooperation between
center right and center left, to solve a problem that does not

must fall in the grip of political opposition.''
It matters more 'general. ''The President of Legambiente
Silk - continues Tortoli - knows that the problem
energy and 'the result of an irresponsible policy of
past.'' Environmentalists should''tell us what they want and
WHAT 'to their national interests. They want
electrical energy - continues the Secretary - but criticized the government for the decree
central unlocks and then talk about renewable energy
, but against the wind 'cause
spoils the landscape. They preach in the waste sector - says
Tortoli - separate collection,
arise against the landfill, but an obstacle to bringing the latest generation of incinerators
.'' (ANSA).

Reputable Online Chinese Grocery

NUCLEAR plutonium from U.S. to France, GREENPEACE

WASHINGTON, Sept. 20 - Greenpeace warns
the environmental organization noted the risks of transporting
a load of 150 kilograms of plutonium in powder form for use
war that is about to leave the naval base in Charleston ,
in South Carolina, directed to the port of Cherbourg, France
. Li 'will be treated to make fuel for nuclear reactors
commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy
.
According to notices from Greenpeace, the operation,
that in some respects and 'novel, and' extremely risky
and transport was a target for terrorist attacks
. The environmental organization
reconstructs the movement of plutonium in powder form, providing information that
and 'impossible to verify in an official way.
The radioactive material 'party by land
laboratories of Los Alamos, New Mexico, three special vehicles equipped
armed escort, and it' arrived at one o'clock in the morning
local station in the Navy in Charleston, where '
ongoing Lopera loading on board a ship flying the British flag and
with armament.
Once you have crossed the Atlantic, plutonium,
unloaded in the port of Cherbourg, northern France, will be 'brought in by land
Caradache nuclear power station, near Marseille
. Here, it will be 'submitted by a company' public
the Areva / Cogema, a treatment to make it four
assembled fuel to power nuclear reactors. After that, the assembled
will return to Charleston and from there
reach their destinations on American soil.
United States does not have facilities suitable
the management of plutonium in dust and air transport
not 'allowed since it does not exist
containers capable of transporting radioactive material
and able to withstand any impact in the event of a disaster or an attack
.
The entire operation is part
in international agreements to dismantle nuclear warheads based on plutonium obsolete
or removed in the implementation of disarmament treaties. But
analysis of Greenpeace, there 'is a risk that it promotes
instead of countering nuclear proliferation.
The U.S. Department of Energy, responsible
operation, maintains silence on the costs and says
Greenpeace, he has not 'bothered to prepare an environmental impact study
for the area of Charleston.
According to Greenpeace, the operation presents the greatest risks in particular during transport and on French soil in the Central Caradache, closed in 2003 for a
leakage of radioactive material and re-telling the ambientalistiproprio
for the processing of cargo coming from
United States.